Underwriting Micro-Flow Sprint
Take one product-line (e.g. SME top-up loans) and turn the manual approval chain into a governed digital flow in ~10 days.
View 10-day sprint →Sapnity implemented a unified underwriting decision hub on Power Platform that sits across multiple LOS instances, connects RMs and underwriters with bureau and internal risk data, and feeds final decisions back into core banking — reducing decision time and rework while tightening policy governance.
Take one product-line (e.g. SME top-up loans) and turn the manual approval chain into a governed digital flow in ~10 days.
View 10-day sprint →Map underwriting leakages, manual overrides and policy breaches across LOS journeys and identify 5–8 quick-win automations.
Start QuickScan →Stand up a governed underwriting workbench, policy engine and audit trail using one flagship product as the anchor.
Explore Starter Pack →The bank had invested in a commercial LOS, but actual underwriting decisions still depended heavily on spreadsheets, emails and offline judgement.
On paper, underwriting was “system-driven”. In reality, it was a patchwork of LOS screens, emails, attachments and Excel trackers.
Sapnity was asked to build a unified Underwriting Decision Hub that works with the existing LOS — not against it.
A “typical” SME loan decision looked structured from the outside — an LOS, a set of policies, and a credit committee. But the internal journey told a different story:
By the time a regulator or internal audit asked, “Why was this exposure approved?”, the best answer was often: “We’ll try to reconstruct it from emails.”
Sapnity introduced a Decision Hub pattern that sits between front-line origination and the LOS / core banking stack. Instead of pushing all logic into LOS screens, the bank now runs underwriting from a unified workbench:
Relationship managers, credit officers and product teams working on the same case view.
Model-driven Power App surfaced in Teams and browser; single workspace for case details, documents, notes and actions.
Centralized decision tables and risk thresholds in Dataverse + Power Automate / Azure Functions for complex rules and eligibility.
Bureau data, internal behavioural scores, collateral values and segment limits stitched together for each application.
Approved / declined status, conditions and covenants written back via APIs; disbursement gates controlled by risk flags.
Power BI dashboards for overrides, turnaround time, segment risk and full decision timelines per application.
This pattern is now the bank’s reference blueprint for new products, new regions and future LOS upgrades — the LOS changes, but the Decision Hub stays.
Phase 1 — Discovery & Policy Mapping
Phase 2 — Data & Decision Model
Phase 3 — Underwriting Workbench
Phase 4 — Rules & Integration
Phase 5 — Rollout & Governance
| KPI | Before | After Sapnity |
|---|---|---|
| Average decision time (standard SME cases) | 3–5 business days | 24–48 hours with clear exception paths |
| Manual rework due to incomplete data | 30–40% of applications | <10% — guided workbench ensures completeness up front |
| Tracked policy overrides | Partial, fragmented in emails | 100% of overrides stored with reason, approver and timestamp |
| Audit / regulator queries | Days to reconstruct narrative | Minutes — full decision timeline in one place |
| Time to launch a new product | Months, tightly coupled to LOS changes | Weeks — Decision Hub pattern reused with new rules & views |
Sapnity didn’t “rip and replace” the LOS. We added a governed underwriting brain that finally made LOS, risk and portfolio teams behave like one system.